Few elementary school teachers are engineers.
Few engineers are elementary school teachers.
And that’s where instructional technology breaks down.
There’s no end to the tech that teachers can integrate in their classrooms, from smart boards to tablets to one-to-one device initiatives to robots and beyond.
As a result, some classrooms are flipping, letting students watch video lectures at home and do the actual exercises in the classroom where teachers and classmates can help. Textbooks come alive on tablets through video and interactive graphics. Students familiarize themselves with applications and devices they’ll use throughout their education and in the workplace.
But something’s missing:
We’re not actually teaching technology. As much as our students are exposed to technology from the youngest ages, they’re mostly being trained as consumers, not as creators. Without literacy in how the technology they use actually works, they won’t have the skills to build and code our future.
That’s where educational technology fails. Here’s how to fix it.
Why do most digital learning tools fall short?
The typical engineer isn’t focused on — or even aware of — the different learning strategies teachers use. Instructional technology is built on engineering principles, not pedagogy. Teachers, on the other hand, often don’t have the engineering knowledge to teach the concepts behind what makes technology work.
The typical classroom might have tablets or computers, and maybe robots or 3D printers to help with learning. Each has its limitations:
Students use tablets and computers as consumers. Whether they’re watching video or drawing pictures or taking virtual field trips or even playing educational games, they’re passive participants. Sure, all those activities have educational value, but they also add to students’ screen time. The average eight to 12-year-old spends six hours in front of a screen every day. For 13 to 18-year-olds, it’s nine hours. For all but a few, that time spent using technology gives them no insight into how those devices and programs work.
Robots and 3D printers break the mold a bit, offering hands-on exercises. But most of them impose a level of abstraction by requiring users to enter instructions on a tablet or computer. The robot performs the directions, and the 3D printer produces the widget designed on the screen, but the actual coding (and the concepts needed to code) remain behind the curtain.
If we really want our kids to gain fluency with technology, here’s what we need:
What to look for in educational technology?
There are three major ways to teach students the inner workings of technology from a young age, and one or more is often missing from digital learning tools.
1. Learn through guidance, encouragement, and collaboration. Students need a bridge between what they know and what they don’t know — what psychologist Lev Vygotskij called the zone of proximal development. Students cross that zone with guidance from teachers, parents, and classmates, but technology too can offer feedback guiding children to the right answer or rewarding them for success. Technology can use students’ existing knowledge to teach computing concepts like loops, functions, routines, subroutines, and so on. But the technology needs to provide feedback — some sort of guidance or encouragement.
2. Get active. The idea that students construct new knowledge from experiences and reflecting on those experiences has long driven teaching plans. Students need to be active in their use of technology. Learning apps and other tools have their place, but they ultimately train students to be passive users. Technology should allow them to question and experiment, create problems and solve them, and to take on a much more active role.
3. Work with something tangible. Seymour Papert, one of the creators of Lego Mindstorms, has long advocated for the creation of physical objects in the real world as a path to learning. There’s no substitute for building a device, taking it apart, and rebuilding it. With a teacher as a guide and mentor, technology should provide these kinds of physical projects for students to complete. It teaches not only the inner workings of technology, but how to troubleshoot and overcome issues as they’re encountered.
With these three things in mind, we can make a more concerted effort to teach our students the technology skills and knowledge they need to excel in school and the future workplace — a subject for our next post.